IJRDET - Proceedings

Journal Ethics Policy

Authors are responsible for their research work carried out, presentation and results expressed. Editor-in-Chief, Editors and Editorial Board does not claim any responsibility, liability of statements made and opinion expressed by authors. Editors do not necessarily agree with the views expressed in the matter published herein. So be careful and aware when you finalize your manuscript. Each manuscript must be free from plagiarism.
Disclaimer
The authors are solely responsible for the contents of the papers compiled in this volume. The publishers or editors do not take any responsibility for the same in any manner. Errors, if any, are purely unintentional and readers are requested to communicate such errors to the editors to avoid discrepancies in future. Papers having any type of plagrised (copy/paste) material will not be entertained in IJRDET. Also, if mistakenly published then it will be suspended with immediate effect. IJRDET request all authors not to submit same paper in Multiple journal.

Ethical guidelines for authors:

Author must appropriately cite any studies relevant to your work in your manuscript.
If Author are quoting text from another publication, even if it is your own, you must cite the source and put the words into quotation marks unless they are paraphrased (i.e. put into your own words).
Author must not submit your manuscript to more than one journal at the same time.
Author must not submit your manuscript to a new journal while waiting for a decision from the first journal you have submitted to.
Author must clearly identify any procedures or equipment used that have any hazards inherent in their use.
If Author have personal or other relationships that might constitute a competing interest relating to the work described in the manuscript, you must declare this.

Ethical guidelines for reviewers:

Keep manuscript and review details secret.
Not use information obtained during the peer-review process for themselves or other persons.
Not allow their reviews to be influenced by the nationality, religious or political beliefs, or by commercial considerations.
Be objective and constructive in their reviews.
Respond in a reasonable time-frame, only agree to review a manuscript if they can return a review within the proposed time-frame, informing the journal promptly if they require an extension.
Review again any manuscript they have previously reviewed for another journal as it may have changed between the two submissions.
In the case of double-blind review, if they suspect the identity of the author(s) notify the journal if this knowledge raises any potential conflict of interest.
Notify the journal immediately if they have concerns about ethical aspects of the work, are aware of substantial similarity between the manuscript and a concurrent submission to another journal or a published article; reviewers should, however, keep their concerns secret and not personally investigate more unless the journal asks for further information or advice.
Not contact the authors directly without the permission of the journal.
Provide evidence with appropriate references to substantiate general statements such as, ‘this work has been done before’, to help editors in their evaluation and decision and in fairness to the authors.
Not attempt to rewrite the paper to their own preferred style if it is basically sound and clear; suggestions for changes that improve clarity are, however, important.
Try to accommodate requests from journals to review revisions or resubmissions of manuscripts they have reviewed.

Ethics topics to consider when publishing:
Originality and plagiarism: The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
Data access and retention: Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data.
Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication: An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. BEIESPJournals do not view the following uses of a work as prior publication: publication in the form of an abstract; publication as an academic thesis; publication as an electronic preprint. Information on prior publication is included within each BEIESP and its journal Guide for Authors.
Acknowledgement of sources: Proper acknowledgment.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest: All submissions must include disclosure of all relationships that could be viewed as presenting a potential conflict of interest.
Fundamental errors in published works: When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
Reporting standards: Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance.
Hazards and human or animal subjects: Statements of compliance are required if the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, or if it involves the use of animal or human subjects.

IJRDET follows strictly follow the following ethics and policies: